North Korea

[Miles]

actually NK doesn't have nukes they will soon but thats not the problem its how its being dealt with instead of taking out kim jong "I dont know what a comb is" jong would be best in stead of tryign ot invade iraq for weapons that aren't really there and iraq poses hardly any threat right now we should take out NK then Iraq.

The weapons are there in Iraq unless you believe that in the years after the weapons inspectors were kicked out that Saddam, in good faith, desroyed existing WMD while halting all development.

We are dealing with North Korea, so don't make the mistake in thinking that we are ignoring them while focusing only on Iraq. However, it is funny to me that you guys condemn us for "rushing" into the war in Iraq after we have given Saddam 12 years of diplomacy, then you want us to invade North Korea immediately. We will try diplomacy to the point of exhaustion, like we did with Iraq, then move to possible military action.

[emprworm]

Do I smell some arrogance there ?,when you say "their time is coming",

Time for what ?

time to quit starving little children while making nuclear bombs with US equipment that belongs to us.

"Producing electricity is a thread ?"

I assume you mean "threat". No. Who is producing electricity?

[Caid Ivik]

Ha, I thought that no one here is so naive to believe that Korean reactor is to enlight Pyongyang ;D

[Edric O]

And why not? If you keep telling him to just TRUST Bush to do the right thing, why can't he tell you to do the same for Kim Jong?

Make up your mind: Either all national leaders are to be trusted, or all should be viewed with suspicion. Right now you're holding a double standard.

[Caid Ivik]

Maybe because of those 'peaceful' diplomacy of last weeks, or disagreeing nuclear non-spreading treaty? There are some countries which CANNOT be trusted until they change their leaders. Country which has 30% of GDP in military production has too aggressive core. Until their Kims will agree a final peace with South and will lower the weapons production, this area will be marked as unstable. And it is dangerous for any country to have nukes in unstable lands. See Israel. Sharon is one of the reasons why USA still stand. One missing bullet, and I am sure he would blow up Baghdad...