Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
that would be stupid, because China has nukes and they would launch them. And no the SDI will not be built until at least 10 more years pass.

dont make me repeat myself. I told you in the beginning one of 2 outcomes:

A) conventional war invasion of the US: world loses, US wins.

B) Nuclear war: World loses, US loses.

If china launched nukes, the US would lose...AND SO WOULD THE WORLD

the US has enough nukes alone to put the entire earth in a nuclear winter. you would have NO VICTORY

dont make me repeat it again. thanks.

Posted

Yeah, I wonder how they can launch a nuke IF THEY ALREADY BOMBED TO DEATH HAHA! ;D America is bombed that is

That's unrealistic. Everyone will have a few hours to hit the button.

Posted
IF THEY ALREADY BOMBED TO DEATH

bombs are dropped from planes dummie :O :P ::)

lol. you dont know what you are talking about, so i think i'm done talking with you.

Posted
But US would not make that strike against China, since they don't want to be wiped out in a nuclear war. Think!

then the world would not be dumb enough to stage 1 billion people in northern canada. we just nuke northern canada. Think!

Posted

Yeah, and where're they going to land if they want to strike China with their airplanes? Another Kamikaze act? They will shot down if they will return to carriers at sea, oh wait, the carriers will be destroyed too if they get near.

And how can they take off if they already destroyed or taken by enemy troops at the ground?

China does have a airforce, I think. Not a well-organized one but they can have airplanes.

Posted

Hmmm, missiles can be launched from missile tubes? Think my friend...

Yeah, and if America nukes Canada, they alert the world about a nuclear war and boom goes America.

He probably watched too many movies about America.

Posted
But US would not make that strike against China, since they don't want to be wiped out in a nuclear war. Think!

then the world would not be dumb enough to stage 1 billion people in northern canada. we just nuke northern canada. Think!

That would also cause nuclear war and US wouldn't want that. Afterall, it's a lot easier to nuke US than to nuke the whole world. You know how many coordinates that would take???

Posted

you underestimate the US weaponry insanely and totally overlook the strategic problems of troop movement, supply chains, and terrain.

there is no way...utterly no way you could ever invade the US.

Yeah, and where're they going to land if they want to strike China with their airplanes?

wont matter if they land or not. once china is roasted, there will be no more ability for your weak world to invade the US.

pilots might die. worthy sacrifice.

Posted

who cares about nuking the world. we dont care about nuking zimbabwe. only the areas where you are moving your millions of trained troops. they will be well-nuked into oblivioun. fallout will poison the rest of the world.

Posted

who cares about nuking the world. we dont care about nuking zimbabwe. only the areas where you are moving your millions of trained troops. they will be well-nuked into oblivioun. fallout will poison the rest of the world.

Exactly, US would be dead, but some of the people of the world would sirvive. US loses - world wins.

Posted

your little world invastion depends on china like a child with a sucker. a baby suckling his mothers breast. take away china, and your entire effort FAILS.

dont you love relying on those communists? make you feel warm inside eh?

Posted

other than china,....you have nothing...NOTHING with which to fight the US. NOTHINGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG

Dude, I think you can still get that catscan today if you call right now ;D

Posted
Exactly, US would be dead, but some of the people of the world would sirvive. US loses - world wins.

world loses as much as the US does. some people in the US will survive as well- all countries and governments would be destroyed. new ones would have to form

world loses. US loses.

Posted
other than china,....you have nothing...NOTHING with which to fight the US. NOTHINGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG

yea, i agree with this point, actually. great quote. who said that?

Posted
Exactly, US would be dead, but some of the people of the world would sirvive. US loses - world wins.

world loses as much as the US does. some people in the US will survive as well- all countries and governments would be destroyed. new ones would have to form

world loses. US loses.

No, every inch of US would be destroyed, while some of the world would not even be touched.

But let's stop this, this is getting boring and monotonous.

Posted

No, every inch of US would be destroyed, while some of the world would not even be touched.

impossible. there are not enough nukes in the entire world- combined with the US to cover every inch of even 4 states in the US.

what are you smoking?

and give some to kirov

Posted
other than china,....you have nothing...NOTHING with which to fight the US. NOTHINGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG

yea, i agree with this point, actually. great quote. who said that?

I'll give you a clue - he think US could beat the rest of the world.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.