It clearly betrays insecurity. But why? They must have enough money really. And this, if anything, would have been good for them. It indicates to me a different type of evil to petty monetary greed. I've been distantly aware of the misdeeds of BH/KJA for some time, but today I read for the first time the decidedly witless term 'talifan'. The mind that created such a word, and the mind that thought it appropriate and amusing to use, can only be very narrow, very small and very vulgar. It betrays a lack of respect for the people it is used on, and a lack of respect for anyone involved in Afghanistan. It betrays a lack of maturity and understanding of politics, and sensitivity toward religion. It is the name-calling rebuke of a schoolchild. I feel that Frank Herbert, a beautiful human being, would have been utterly disgusted. With this unneccesary and intollerant censorship it is they who could learn a little of what NOT to do from authoritarian institutions such as the taliban. Bitter irony! KJA blog "Disappointing news, but not surprising. Brian and I are aware of a small group of fans like that, particularly congregating on a few discussion boards. My friend, artist Bob Eggleton (who painted the cover for my novel THE MARTIAN WAR) calls them the "Talifan.""