Dude_Doc Posted December 7, 2002 Share Posted December 7, 2002 Yes he does. So, what does everyone here think will happen next? Is Saddam telling the truth from the heart, that he is really sad about the invasion of Kuwait, or does he just "picture it out" in the media for folks to believe? Will there be more terrorist actions after this? I'd say Saddam has shipped out all his deadly weapons and weapons of MD a long time ago. I think the UN is just playing around. It's like telling your parents to search your room for drugs when you already have hidden them in another place (ie not in your room :P). And what will they do when they finnish the search? Will they still be monitoring Iraq, or is that against UN rules, if there are such? Your opinion. Stay on topic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anathema Posted December 7, 2002 Share Posted December 7, 2002 I seriously doubt he has them (yet). If he did, or is developing them, they probably aren't going to be found. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acriku Posted December 8, 2002 Share Posted December 8, 2002 I read they've found mustard gas shells? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilVirus Posted December 8, 2002 Share Posted December 8, 2002 1. You actually expect a tyrant who killed thousands of his own people to tell the truth about his WOMD?2. Only a braindead person would actually not hide the WOMD, having several months to do it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TMA_1 Posted December 8, 2002 Share Posted December 8, 2002 Hussein is a wonderful man.lol cant wait to see your guys' reactions. anyways enough of the immaturity. The problem is, saddam has done many dealings that deserve his destruction. Iraq should be taken for its own people's use and how they see fit, since they live there and all and "we are not a tyrannic government that controls what other nations do.) ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dude_Doc Posted December 8, 2002 Author Share Posted December 8, 2002 But how can they do that when their government is ruled by one man? Their government decides what the people can say and can not. Besides, the people can't excape the country. They don't have any money, or most of those who want's to leave don't. And where should they go? They are an oppressed population, that's why the U.S. cares what becomes of them. Why the U.S. don't go after North Korea, is because North Korea do not have a dictator that executes thousands of his own people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Sadukar Posted December 8, 2002 Share Posted December 8, 2002 Man just wait to Edric and emprworm finds this on, it'll grwo to 12 pages overnight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edric O Posted December 8, 2002 Share Posted December 8, 2002 You have a problem with our arguments, Sard? >:(For your information, I had no intention of getting involved in this topic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilVirus Posted December 8, 2002 Share Posted December 8, 2002 You have a problem with our arguments, Sard? >:(For your information, I had no intention of getting involved in this topic.Lol, he ws joking man. You know that thing that you do to make other people laugh? ;D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edric O Posted December 8, 2002 Share Posted December 8, 2002 Well I personally find his "joke" distasteful. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Sadukar Posted December 8, 2002 Share Posted December 8, 2002 You have a problem with our arguments, Sard? >:(For your information, I had no intention of getting involved in this topic.No I'm just afraid of any topic that grows to 12 pages overnight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nemafakei Posted December 8, 2002 Share Posted December 8, 2002 Ideally, Hussein should be removed. But so should many others. If the US is to take this man on, then they should also bind themselves oficially to the UN to remove other similarly evil men. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terror Posted December 8, 2002 Share Posted December 8, 2002 well you know the problem is... they could've done it long before.. in the gulf war the were almost there and could've kicked saddam from the throne.. but because the US didn't know a good candidate to rule Irak they stopped the invasion and pulled back.. that is the only reason why saddam is still there Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dude_Doc Posted December 8, 2002 Author Share Posted December 8, 2002 No. They had no good reason to invade Iraq. But after 9/11 they had. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TMA_1 Posted December 8, 2002 Share Posted December 8, 2002 "Well I personally find his "joke" distasteful."lol its true edric. chill out man. You know you and empr and ace type out more crap than anybody else in Dune2k.lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exatreide Posted December 8, 2002 Share Posted December 8, 2002 Shesh u may even out type the people in fan fiction lol...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terror Posted December 8, 2002 Share Posted December 8, 2002 [quote author=ExAtreides Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dezertfish Posted December 10, 2002 Share Posted December 10, 2002 well you know the problem is... they could've done it long before.. in the gulf war the were almost there and could've kicked saddam from the throne..The allies had several opportunities to stop Hitler early too, but they waited until it was almost too late. He had already taken Austria, Chechoslavakia, and flat out told everyone he was going to conquer the world in Mein Kampf. Britain and France waited until he took Poland to do anything. The US waited until Japan had attacked them.If Saddam Hussein isn't stopped now, the UN will have proved to be just as ineffective now as the league of nations was then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dude_Doc Posted December 11, 2002 Author Share Posted December 11, 2002 The Leauge of Nations was just another bullshit thing, very much like the UN are today. At that time, countries didn't think of other countries as much. No one cared for Poland or Norway or something. They just did not want another war, so they gave Hitler and the Reich the grantenance. But after Hitler went mad and tried to conquer the world, then the Allies had do cowork to do anything. Or maybe there is something much bigger behind both the LN and UN? Nobody knows. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quoudam72 Posted December 11, 2002 Share Posted December 11, 2002 Dezertfish the 'goal' of the Gulf War wasn't to remove Saddam (from his seat of power) but to stop his futher invasion of Kuwait. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.