jacobdouds Posted March 2, 2002 Share Posted March 2, 2002 We have many advanced technologys that make units last longer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House_Corrino Posted March 3, 2002 Share Posted March 3, 2002 Like mortars with titanium heads, I'm guessing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sardauker-Kirov Posted March 3, 2002 Share Posted March 3, 2002 Isnt Titanium not a Obselete metal in the future?Besides, A Sniper bullet can easily penetrate Titanium. If you study the Kinetic force of a Bullet hitting upon the metal. ;D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House_Corrino Posted March 3, 2002 Share Posted March 3, 2002 Are you suggeting a sniper bullet can penetrate tank armor? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sardauker-Kirov Posted March 3, 2002 Share Posted March 3, 2002 Not exactly. Besides they are made of metal. I think.It also Depends on the Thickness of the Metal. If you take the Tiger Tanks of the Germans, That tank is the ultimate tank. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House_Corrino Posted March 3, 2002 Share Posted March 3, 2002 Anyways, titanium is stronger than steel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dezertfish Posted March 8, 2002 Share Posted March 8, 2002 Not by much (if at all)The main advantage of titanium over steel is that it weighs less. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacobdouds Posted March 9, 2002 Share Posted March 9, 2002 The american M-2 can survive a nuclear blast. The people inside die but the tank doesn't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ligic_Tha_Master Posted March 9, 2002 Share Posted March 9, 2002 Surviving at its worst ;D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacobdouds Posted March 9, 2002 Share Posted March 9, 2002 But still surviving. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ligic_Tha_Master Posted March 10, 2002 Share Posted March 10, 2002 Unfortunately. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacobdouds Posted March 10, 2002 Share Posted March 10, 2002 But the M-2 would be a great tank to have in E:BFD. If it gets deathhanded, you just have to wait for the radiation to wear off. Then send some light infantry into it like an APC and you can use it again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ligic_Tha_Master Posted March 11, 2002 Share Posted March 11, 2002 Ghosty and Edric O could add that to their mod :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacobdouds Posted March 11, 2002 Share Posted March 11, 2002 How? That would be a lot more complicated to make a Assault tank apc like that only works with infantry and can not be killed by Deathhand. Plus it would be unfair, as it would be almost impossible to die. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ligic_Tha_Master Posted March 12, 2002 Share Posted March 12, 2002 What do you mean, "almost impossible to kill"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacobdouds Posted March 12, 2002 Share Posted March 12, 2002 The M-2 can survive a nuke. Therefore, other units won't have much of a chance against it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caid Ivik Posted March 21, 2002 Share Posted March 21, 2002 Ha, that's only stupid American propaganda! It can survive a nuclear blast (2 km from epicentre, 200 kt warhead), but what about some good old 125 mm Spirals with uranium warhead? Hmm, good old days of Cold War.Also I suppose to believe for infantry power of Sardaukars. Also, Kindjals on 2nd level have nearly doubled range! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dezertfish Posted April 3, 2002 Share Posted April 3, 2002 don't nuclear weapons destroy things on an atomic scale? :-/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black_Emperor Posted April 4, 2002 Share Posted April 4, 2002 nuclear weapons only hurt things by the exploding sharpnel and heat. Then after that, Poisons the surrounding area with high doses radiation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fremen_Mentat Posted April 8, 2002 Share Posted April 8, 2002 Hi. I was FremenEmporer, who started this topic. It's amazing. Though my question has been answered, you kepp discussing it. thats neat. thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sneezer3 Posted April 9, 2002 Share Posted April 9, 2002 don't nuclear weapons destroy things on an atomic scale? :-/yes. but if WW had made the hark super weapon like that. LOL ever1 would be playin hark. if superweapons where on! 8) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black_Emperor Posted April 10, 2002 Share Posted April 10, 2002 hark's death hand would literally nuke everything Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dezertfish Posted April 19, 2002 Share Posted April 19, 2002 [Fisher's plain](Atreides and hark fighting in a skirmish)Death hand launch detected(Atreides use Hawk Strike on themselves)No more Harkonnen/Atreides?Fisher's PlainSound about right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caid Ivik Posted April 19, 2002 Share Posted April 19, 2002 don't nuclear weapons destroy things on an atomic scale? :-/What's an atomic scale? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timenn Posted April 19, 2002 Share Posted April 19, 2002 Actually, it is a scale from 1 : 10^21, sort like. But isn't this topic about veteran Atreides Troops? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.